Hi, On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:31:27PM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote: > I used test 263 to verify that fsx works as expected with the new -T and the > existing -N options. With the -T option of course, test 263 will fail. I > don't suggest that we change existing tests but add new tests which use the > new -T option. Do you have a new test which you intend to use the -T option > that can be submitted with this patch? I understand that changing behaviour of existing checks is not desirable. The -T option to fsx was inspired by the test we used to hunt a bug at 3.8-rc time where 50 concurrent direct io fsx jobs triggered the bug in about 10 minutes or it was considered fine. fsx -q xxxf$x -Z -R -W -r 4096 -w 4096 (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/22447) I'll send this test integrated into xfstests harness. david _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
