On 03/07/13 06:41, rjohnston@xxxxxxx wrote:
When updating the patch, the redirect was incorrect. Reported-by: Wang Sheng-Hui<shhuiw@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston<rjohnston@xxxxxxx> --- 273 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: b/273 =================================================================== --- a/273 +++ b/273 @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ _porter() exit fi - cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>$seq.full 2>>&1 + cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>>$seq.full 2>&1 if [ $? -ne 0 ] then echo "_porter $_suffix not complete"
The original patch looked okay: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-02/msg00518.html Should the bad patch be reverted and the original one put in? --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
