Hi CAI, On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:11:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:52:34AM -0500, CAI Qian wrote: > > This is to request to apply the below commit for the stable releases > > in order to fix a regression introduced by 055388a (xfs: dynamic > > speculative EOF preallocation) that caused fsync() took long time during > > the sparse file testing. > > > > For stable-3.4 and stable-3.8, it can be applied as it is. For stable-3.0, > > please see the below patch which fixed the context and used xfs_bmapi() > > instead of xfs_bmapi_read() which yet in the tree. Also tested on the > > stable-3.0 to confirmed the original fsync() slowness regression is now > > gone. Please review and ACK. > > I've already said no to -stable in another discussion thread, and > that discussion has not yet played out. please do not try to preempt > any discussion by sending patches to @stable before it is even > decided if it is something we *need* to fix in 2 year old kernels. > Yes, you have input into the discussion, but please do not take it > upon yourself to determine what should be backported to -stable and > what shouldn't be - that is for the subsystem maintainers to decide. > > FWIW, is your memory so short that you don't remember what happened > a couple of weeks ago with the last XFS bugfix backport you > requested directly to @stable and was accepted based on "it applies > and builds, so it's OK?" i.e. without proper review, discussion or > testing? > > That's right - it caused a major functional regression and that > wasted a heap of time for quite a few people in sorting it out. > > So right now this request gets a big, fat, loud NACK from me while > the aforementioned discussion takes place. I appreciate that you've been willing to do the legwork on this. That's really nice work, but I agree with Dave that it needs a closer look before we request that it be picked up in -stable. Lets get this reviewed and tested on xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx before bringing it to the attention of the -stable folk. We can continue to work through this in the other thread. Thanks for spending the time! ;) Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
