Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch has been committed.

Thanks
--Rich

commit 864688d368d6781c3f6d60bc55b5e3591953e462
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Mar 5 17:59:42 2013 +0000

    xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255

    As of Linux 3.9-rc1, ext4 will support the punch operation on file
    systems using indirect blocks, but it can not support the fallocate
    operation (since there is no way to mark a block as uninitialized
    using indirect block scheme).  This caused test 255 to fail, since it
    only used _require_xfS_io_falloc_punch assuming that all file systems
    which supported punch can also support fallocate.  Fix this.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux