On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:21:44PM -0500, Matteo Frigo wrote:
> Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:04:14AM +0000, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> >> (Quick pointers that might be relevant)
> >>
> >> EAGAIN, I'm not aware of dm itself returning that on the i/o path.
> >
> > Neither am I, but it's coming from somewhere in the IO path...
>
> Well, I don't really know anything about this topic, so I may be
> completely off the mark, but dm-raid1.c:mirror_map() does indeed return
> EWOULDBLOCK, and EWOULDBLOCK is #define'd to be EAGAIN, so it seems to
> me that dm-raid1 does indeed return EAGAIN for "rw == READA" (which I
> assume is read-ahead) if the "region is not in-sync":
>
> /*
> * If region is not in-sync queue the bio.
> */
> if (!r || (r == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
> if (rw == READA)
> return -EWOULDBLOCK;
>
> queue_bio(ms, bio, rw);
> return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> }
Trees, forest....
Thanks for pointing out the obvious, Matteo. :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
