On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:51:51AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Test #100 does not use scratch device at all but it still > _require_scratch and _check_scratch_fs. This might also be a problem if > the test before this one failed and corrupted scratch partition. > > Remove the _require_scratch() and _check_scratch_fs() from the test. Actaully, I think it should be using scratch - have a look at where TEMP_DIR is located. Yeah, it's /tmp, not the scratch device. i.e. it should be using the TEST_DIR rather than tmp for building the tarball, and scratch for restoring it.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
