On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:25:47PM -0500, Nathan Scott wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > ... > > 'make deb' failed for me like this: > > > > signfile xfsprogs_3.1.9.dsc > > gpg: skipped "Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>": secret key not > > available > > gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available > > > > dpkg-genchanges >../xfsprogs_3.1.9_amd64.changes > > dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload > > dpkg-buildpackage: full upload; Debian-native package (full source is > > included) > > dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Failed to sign .dsc and .changes file > > make: *** [deb] Error 1 > > > > Secure-by-default is a great idea but it seems that in this case it > > also > > requires that anyone who wants to do a build for debian has to do it > > on a > > machine with a keyring containing your secret key. ;) > > > > Awkward. :) Really I don't mind. What was your passphrase again? > > I think it is also reasonable for devs to be able to build test debs > > *nod* ... not sure what trickery Dave had used. I tried setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="-us -uc" but no luck. > But, perhaps a better > way to tackle this would be similar to the way the build allows extra > configure options to be passed in. > > include/builddefs: configure > ./configure $$LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS > > so, perhaps something like this... > > # LOCAL_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTIONS="-us -uc" for unsigned debs > deb: include/builddefs include/platform_defs.h > ... > $(Q)cd $(SRCDIR) && dpkg-buildpackage $$LOCAL_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTIONS Gotcha. I'll take a look. Thanks for the reviews! -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
