Le 13/02/2013 18:20, Eric Sandeen a écrit :
On 2/13/13 11:04 AM, Rémi Cailletaud wrote:
Hi,
I face a strange and scary issue. I just grow a xfs filesystem (44To), and no way to mount it anymore :
XFS: device supports only 4096 byte sectors (not 512)
Did you expand an LV made of 512-sector physical devices by adding 4k-sector physical devices?
The three devices are ARECA 1880 card, but the last one was added later,
and I never check for sector physical configuration on card configuration.
But yes, running fdisk, it seems that sda and sdb are 512, and sdc is
4k... :(
that's probably not something we anticipate or check for....
What sector size(s) are the actual lowest level disks under all the lvm pieces?
What command to run to get this info ?
rémi
-Eric
# xfs_check /dev/vg0/tomo-201111
ERROR: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which needs to
be replayed. Mount the filesystem to replay the log, and unmount it before
re-running xfs_check. If you are unable to mount the filesystem, then use
the xfs_repair -L option to destroy the log and attempt a repair.
Note that destroying the log may cause corruption -- please attempt a mount
of the filesystem before doing this.
# xfs_repair -L /dev/vg0/tomo-201111
xfs_repair: warning - cannot set blocksize 512 on block device /dev/vg0/tomo-201111: Argument invalide
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
superblock read failed, offset 1099511623680, size 2048, ag 1, rval -1
fatal error -- Invalid argument
Conf is as follow :
LVM : 3pv - 1vg
the lv containing the xfs system is on several extents :
tomo-201111 vg0 -wi-ao 1 linear 15,34t /dev/sda:5276160-9298322
tomo-201111 vg0 -wi-ao 1 linear 18,66t /dev/sdb:0-4890732
tomo-201111 vg0 -wi-ao 1 linear 8,81t /dev/sdb:6987885-9298322
tomo-201111 vg0 -wi-ao 1 linear 1,19t /dev/sdc:2883584-3194585
before growing fs, I lvextend the vg, and a new extents on /dev/sdc was used. I cant think it caused this issue... I saw there can be problem with underlying device (an ARECA 1880). With xfs_db, I found this strange :
"logsectsize = 0"
# xfs_db -c "sb 0" -c "p" /dev/vg0/tomo-201111
magicnum = 0x58465342
blocksize = 4096
dblocks = 10468982745
rblocks = 0
rextents = 0
uuid = 09793bea-952b-44fa-be71-02f59e69b41b
logstart = 1342177284
rootino = 128
rbmino = 129
rsumino = 130
rextsize = 1
agblocks = 268435455
agcount = 39
rbmblocks = 0
logblocks = 521728
versionnum = 0xb4b4
sectsize = 512
inodesize = 256
inopblock = 16
fname = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"
blocklog = 12
sectlog = 9
inodelog = 8
inopblog = 4
agblklog = 28
rextslog = 0
inprogress = 0
imax_pct = 5
icount = 6233280
ifree = 26
fdblocks = 1218766953
frextents = 0
uquotino = 0
gquotino = 0
qflags = 0
flags = 0
shared_vn = 0
inoalignmt = 2
unit = 0
width = 0
dirblklog = 0
logsectlog = 0
logsectsize = 0
logsunit = 1
features2 = 0xa
bad_features2 = 0xa
Any idea ?
Cheers,
rémi
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Rémi Cailletaud - IE CNRS
3SR - Laboratoire Sols, Solides, Structures - Risques
BP53, 38041 Grenoble CEDEX 0
FRANCE
remi.cailletaud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél: +33 (0)4 76 82 52 78
Fax: +33 (0)4 76 82 70 43
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
