This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "XFS development tree".
The branch, for-next has been updated
ced55f3 xfs: Fix possible use-after-free with AIO
3b19034 xfs: fix shutdown hang on invalid inode during create
4d559a3 xfs: limit speculative prealloc near ENOSPC thresholds
10616b8 xfs: fix _xfs_buf_find oops on blocks beyond the filesystem end
from 003fd6c8be14a348c56cb1d171605ab13fca906f (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit ced55f38d6bde7c10a14ea51c2edcd51a98575e3
Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jan 23 13:56:18 2013 +0100
xfs: Fix possible use-after-free with AIO
Running AIO is pinning inode in memory using file reference. Once AIO
is completed using aio_complete(), file reference is put and inode can
be freed from memory. So we have to be sure that calling aio_complete()
is the last thing we do with the inode.
CC: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
commit 3b19034d4f4554e39ca244fb28962bbf2ccba046
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jan 21 23:53:55 2013 +1100
xfs: fix shutdown hang on invalid inode during create
When the new inode verify in xfs_iread() fails, the create
transaction is aborted and a shutdown occurs. The subsequent unmount
then hangs in xfs_wait_buftarg() on a buffer that has an elevated
hold count. Debug showed that it was an AGI buffer getting stuck:
[ 22.576147] XFS (vdb): buffer 0x2/0x1, hold 0x2 stuck
[ 22.976213] XFS (vdb): buffer 0x2/0x1, hold 0x2 stuck
[ 23.376206] XFS (vdb): buffer 0x2/0x1, hold 0x2 stuck
[ 23.776325] XFS (vdb): buffer 0x2/0x1, hold 0x2 stuck
The trace of this buffer leading up to the shutdown (trimmed for
brevity) looks like:
xfs_buf_init: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller xfs_buf_get_map
xfs_buf_get: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 1 caller xfs_buf_read_map
xfs_buf_read: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 1 caller xfs_trans_read_buf_map
xfs_buf_iorequest: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller _xfs_buf_read
xfs_buf_hold: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller xfs_buf_iorequest
xfs_buf_rele: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 2 caller xfs_buf_iorequest
xfs_buf_iowait: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller _xfs_buf_read
xfs_buf_ioerror: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 1 caller xfs_buf_bio_end_io
xfs_buf_iodone: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller _xfs_buf_ioend
xfs_buf_iowait_done: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller _xfs_buf_read
xfs_buf_hold: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller xfs_buf_item_init
xfs_trans_read_buf: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 2 recur 0 refcount 1
xfs_trans_brelse: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 2 recur 0 refcount 1
xfs_buf_item_relse: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 2 caller xfs_trans_brelse
xfs_buf_rele: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 2 caller xfs_buf_item_relse
xfs_buf_unlock: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller xfs_trans_brelse
xfs_buf_rele: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 1 caller xfs_trans_brelse
xfs_buf_trylock: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 2 caller _xfs_buf_find
xfs_buf_find: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 2 caller xfs_buf_get_map
xfs_buf_get: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 2 caller xfs_buf_read_map
xfs_buf_read: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 2 caller xfs_trans_read_buf_map
xfs_buf_hold: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 2 caller xfs_buf_item_init
xfs_trans_read_buf: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 3 recur 0 refcount 1
xfs_trans_log_buf: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 3 recur 0 refcount 1
xfs_buf_item_unlock: bno 0x2 len 0x200 hold 3 flags DIRTY liflags ABORTED
xfs_buf_unlock: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 3 caller xfs_buf_item_unlock
xfs_buf_rele: bno 0x2 nblks 0x1 hold 3 caller xfs_buf_item_unlock
And that is the AGI buffer from cold cache read into memory to
transaction abort. You can see at transaction abort the bli is dirty
and only has a single reference. The item is not pinned, and it's
not in the AIL. Hence the only reference to it is this transaction.
The problem is that the xfs_buf_item_unlock() call is dropping the
last reference to the xfs_buf_log_item attached to the buffer (which
holds a reference to the buffer), but it is not freeing the
xfs_buf_log_item. Hence nothing will ever release the buffer, and
the unmount hangs waiting for this reference to go away.
The fix is simple - xfs_buf_item_unlock needs to detect the last
reference going away in this case and free the xfs_buf_log_item to
release the reference it holds on the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
commit 4d559a3bcb7383f34334092af07e68fb60910684
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jan 21 23:53:54 2013 +1100
xfs: limit speculative prealloc near ENOSPC thresholds
There is a window on small filesytsems where specualtive
preallocation can be larger than that ENOSPC throttling thresholds,
resulting in specualtive preallocation trying to reserve more space
than there is space available. This causes immediate ENOSPC to be
triggered, prealloc to be turned off and flushing to occur. One the
next write (i.e. next 4k page), we do exactly the same thing, and so
effective drive into synchronous 4k writes by triggering ENOSPC
flushing on every page while in the window between the prealloc size
and the ENOSPC prealloc throttle threshold.
Fix this by checking to see if the prealloc size would consume all
free space, and throttle it appropriately to avoid premature
ENOSPC...
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
commit 10616b806d1d7835b1d23b8d75ef638f92cb98b6
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jan 21 23:53:52 2013 +1100
xfs: fix _xfs_buf_find oops on blocks beyond the filesystem end
When _xfs_buf_find is passed an out of range address, it will fail
to find a relevant struct xfs_perag and oops with a null
dereference. This can happen when trying to walk a filesystem with a
metadata inode that has a partially corrupted extent map (i.e. the
block number returned is corrupt, but is otherwise intact) and we
try to read from the corrupted block address.
In this case, just fail the lookup. If it is readahead being issued,
it will simply not be done, but if it is real read that fails we
will get an error being reported. Ideally this case should result
in an EFSCORRUPTED error being reported, but we cannot return an
error through xfs_buf_read() or xfs_buf_get() so this lookup failure
may result in ENOMEM or EIO errors being reported instead.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 12 ++++++++++--
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 9 +++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
XFS development tree
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
