On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:53:52PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When _xfs_buf_find is passed an out of range address, it will fail
> to find a relevant struct xfs_perag and oops with a null
> dereference. This can happen when trying to walk a filesystem with a
> metadata inode that has a partially corrupted extent map (i.e. the
> block number returned is corrupt, but is otherwise intact) and we
> try to read from the corrupted block address.
>
> In this case, just fail the lookup. If it is readahead being issued,
> it will simply not be done, but if it is real read that fails we
> will get an error being reported. Ideally this case should result
> in an EFSCORRUPTED error being reported, but we cannot return an
> error through xfs_buf_read() or xfs_buf_get() so this lookup failure
> may result in ENOMEM or EIO errors being reported instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 56d1614..689d726 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
> struct rb_node *parent;
> xfs_buf_t *bp;
> xfs_daddr_t blkno = map[0].bm_bn;
> + xfs_daddr_t eofs;
> int numblks = 0;
> int i;
>
> @@ -498,6 +499,23 @@ _xfs_buf_find(
> ASSERT(!(numbytes < (1 << btp->bt_sshift)));
> ASSERT(!(BBTOB(blkno) & (xfs_off_t)btp->bt_smask));
>
> + /*
> + * Corrupted block numbers can get through to here, unfortunately, so we
> + * have to check that the buffer falls within the filesystem bounds.
> + */
> + eofs = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(btp->bt_mount, btp->bt_mount->m_sb.sb_dblocks);
> + if (blkno >= eofs) {
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
