Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] xfs: add a helper to figure out the space log reservation per item

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/18/13 21:28, Jeff Liu wrote:
On 01/19/2013 07:03 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
On 01/10/13 07:47, Jeff Liu wrote:
Add a helper xfs_calc_buf_res() to calcuate out the space log reservations per item which were got
involved in a transaction.  It will call the xfs_buf_log_overhead() to figure out the extra space
for the struct xfs_buf_log_format that gets written into the log for every buffer as well as a little
bit of extra space because there also needs a log opheader, i.e. struct xlog_op_header.

The commit message is too wide.

Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 06ed520..6c601ea 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -37,14 +37,45 @@
   #include "xfs_extent_busy.h"
   #include "xfs_bmap.h"
   #include "xfs_quota.h"
+#include "xfs_qm.h"
   #include "xfs_trans_priv.h"
   #include "xfs_trans_space.h"
   #include "xfs_inode_item.h"
+#include "xfs_log_priv.h"
+#include "xfs_buf_item.h"
   #include "xfs_trace.h"

   kmem_zone_t	*xfs_trans_zone;
   kmem_zone_t	*xfs_log_item_desc_zone;

+/*
+ * A buffer has a format structure overhead in the log in addition
+ * to the data, so we need to take this into account when reserving
+ * space in a transaction for a buffer.  Round the space required up
+ * to a multiple of 128 bytes so that we don't change the historical
+ * reservation that has been used for this overhead.
+ */
+STATIC uint
+xfs_buf_log_overhead(void)
+{
+	return round_up(sizeof(struct xlog_op_header) +
+			sizeof(struct xfs_buf_log_format), 128);
+}

Not used directly except below. inline or fold below?
I should be inline.  Maybe it's proper to make xfs_calc_buf_res() inline
as well?

Looks like these routines just get run at boot time - the existing reservations routines that run at boot time are routines too, so you are following the existing style. So I don't want to build a bikeshed so I am flexible on this point.

There appears seems to be some errors in patch 2....

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux