Here's how I use it:
I perform pwrite() operations of various sizes. These are "blocks" in my application. These blocks are always 4KB-aligned, but they are of many different sizes. Most writes are near a megabyte in size, but hardly ever exactly a megabyte.
I also punch holes. The holes always correspond exactly to a previously written pwrite().
A pwrite() always writes into a hole. (It never overwrites current data).
For example I might write
1MB at offset 1MB
then write 3MB at offset 2MB
then punch a hole of size 1MB at offset 1MB
then do some more activity elsewhere in the file
then write 512K at an offset of 1MB (partially filling the hole that I had punched)
I have a lot of experience running this code on xfs without the hole punching. The pattern of the pwrite()'s are the same with or without hole punching. So I'd hope that the hole punching didn't make things any worse, and maybe made things better.
Can I expect that this will work reasonably well?
By the way, all of your help has been outstanding.
-Bradley
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
