Re: hole punching performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: hole punching performance
From: "Bradley C. Kuszmaul" <kuszmaul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:31:19 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130103220717.GI3120@dastard>

What are the requirements for alignment of punched holes? Is 512-byte alignment good enough? (I'll have 512-byte alignment anyway since I'll be using direct I/O on these files.)

-Bradley

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hole punching performance
  - From: Dave Chinner

References:
- hole punching performance
  - From: Bradley C. Kuszmaul
- Re: hole punching performance
  - From: Dave Chinner
- Re: hole punching performance
  - From: Bradley C. Kuszmaul

Prev by Date: Re: help xfs filesystem crash
Next by Date: [PATCH] xfs: serialize iclog write of xlog_cil_push
Previous by thread: Re: hole punching performance
Next by thread: Re: hole punching performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux XFS Devel] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Filesystem Testing] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux