hi mathias and ben, thanks for your fast reply. i've already played around with the allocsize option. xfs_bmap shows continuous files, as expected. i'm just worried, because these mismatches never showed before (while the volume was less than 50% full) and we didn't changed the workload. a quick comparsion shows overhead of about 1% for the whole volume, but given the 28MB overhead for 100MB, i expect this to increase in the future. On 01/04/2013 05:14 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > This fixes itself over time. > Either do enough IO that the cache of the copy gets reused or umount or i cannot understand that. does a already written file gets reorganized due to high I/O, because we've got that periodically. cheers pille _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
