On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:54:16AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 09:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > As such I'd like to see this sort of thing encoded in a macro or
> > inline function so the above code becomes something like:
> >
> > return mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize + xfs_buf_log_overhead(mp);
> >
> >
> > and
> >
> > /*
> > * A buffer has a format structure overhead in the log in addition
> > * to the data, so we need to take this into account when reserving
> > * space in a transaction for a buffer. Round the space required up
> > * to a multiple of 128 bytes so that we don't change the historical
> > * reservation that has ben used for this overhead.
> > */
> > static inline int
> > xfs_buf_log_overhead()
> > {
> > return round_up(sizeof(struct xlog_op_header) +
> > sizeof(struct xfs_buf_log_format), 128);
> > }
> Thanks for your teaching!
>
> We hard-coded '128' in almost all of those transaction reservations,
> is it time to get rid of it according to your comments above?
>
> I'd like to do it if you have no time to deal with such trivial things.
Yes please!
It's been on my "clean-ups for a rainy day" list for a long time,
but I've never managed to get around to it. So if you want to do
this, it would make me very happy :)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
