Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:12:53PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:24:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written
> > directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a
> > regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the
> > default behaviour").
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next.
> 
> What's with the multiple Signed-off-by?  Is your cousin Dave getting involved
> in XFS development too?  Welcome!  ;)

Ah, I forgot the "-s" flag to guilt patchbomb which prevents it
git-send-email from adding signed-off-by lines from the local
repository committer. That's my mistake (it's the first time I've
ever done that), you can kill the ones from the david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
address.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux