On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:54:27AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Yes, I know, but the original patch I had that changed the ranges to > something sensible was causing fsx and other failures all over the > place. It appears that setting the ranges appropriately here exposes > other (worse) bugs, so I decided to leave doing that until I have > time to go on a wild goose chase.... I'm actually very happy with doing it separately, I just really prefer comments to be put in place on why it's done the way it is in case we forget about it again, which history has shown to happen way too often. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
