On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:41:21PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > This patch sets all the b_bmap accesses to be b_maps[0]. b_maps[0] > works for single and multiple segment buffers. > > This fixes a bug where xfs_trans_buf_item_match() could not find a > multi-segment buffer associated with the transaction because it was > looking for the block number in the single segment location > b_map.bm.bn rather than the new generic b_maps[0].bm.bn. This > resulted in recursive buffer lock that can never be satisfied. Should b_map be renamed to __b_map so that accesses to it are cought more easily? Also do hyou have a test case for the issue? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
