"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi everybody, > > On March 29th, Jeff Moyer posted to lkml a patchset with this note: > >> Currently, AIO+DIO+O_SYNC writes are not actually sync'd (for xfs), or they >> are sync'd before the I/O is actually issued (everybody else). The following >> patch series fixes this in two parts. First, for the file systems that use >> the generic routines, Jan has provided some generic infrastructure to perform >> the syncs after the I/O is completed. Second, for those file systems which >> require some endio processing of their own for O_DIRECT writes (xfs and >> ext4), [Jeff] implemented file system specific syncing. This passes the >> updated xfs-tests 113 test [Jeff] posted earlier, as well as all of the tests >> in the aio group. [Jeff] tested ext3, ext4, xfs, and btrfs only. > > Since the original post a few months ago, this patchset doesn't seem to have > made any progress. An internal testing team here discovered that the issue > also affects O_SYNC+AIO+DIO writes to block devices. Worse yet, since the > flushes were being issued (and waited upon) directly in the io_submit call > graph, the io_submit calls themselves would take a very long time to complete. > Therefore, I added another patch to move the flush to the io_end processing. > > The blockdev patch was written by me. The ext4 patch had to be updated to > accomodate a rework of the ext4 endio code that landed since March. Everything > else has been passed through from Jeff's March 30th resend, with few changes. > > This patchset has been tested (albeit lightly) against 3.7-rc6 on x64, with > ext4, xfs, btrfs, vfat, jfs, hfsplus, ext2, ext3, and raw block devices. > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. Hi, Darrick, I just finished testing my version of this patch set on ext4 and xfs (btrfs is next), but you beat me to the posting! Sorry, I should have been more clear when I said I would see about refreshing the series. How have you tested these patches? You just said "lightly", and I'm afraid I don't know what that means. xfstests? You should at least run them through test 113. Would you like to push the set in, or should I post the patches I've got? Doesn't matter to me, just let me know. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
