Re: better perf and memory uage for xfs_fsr? Trivial patch against xfstools-3.16 included...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:30:11PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> FWIW, the benefit, probably comes from the read-file, as the written file
> is written with DIRECT I/O and I can't see that it should make a difference
> there.

Hmmm, so it does. I think that's probably the bug that needs to be
fixed, not so much using posix_fadvise....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux