On 11/06/2012 05:43 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:55:04AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
>...
>> I can also squash this into the original and post a new version if that is
>> preferred.
>
> I'll probably do that myself - the current code I have is a little
> different so the patch probably won't apply, anyway. I'll need to
> munge it to suit the eventual struct xfs_eofblocks format, anyway.
>
Ok, I'll have a v2 replacement of this once the alignment thing is fixed
up...
>
>> @@ -136,7 +142,7 @@ prealloc_help(void)
>> "\n"
...
>> - prealloc_cmd.argmin = 1;
>> + prealloc_cmd.argmin = 0;
>
> While technically correct, it's not the desired behaviour. I wanted
> it to issue the usage if you just type the comment. I think I need
> to add a "-a" flag for "flush all" here.
>
Ok.
>> - prealloc_cmd.oneline = _("Control specualtive preallocation");
>> + prealloc_cmd.oneline = _("Control speculative preallocation");
>
> Good catch, Brain! :)
>
Today a typo, tomorrow the world! ;)
Brain
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
