Hi Dave, On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 08:27:08AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:57:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:15:01AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > > We're working toward a userspace release this month. There are several patches > > > that need to go in first, including backing out the xfsdump format version bump > > > from Eric, fixes for the makefiles from Mike, and the Polish language update > > > for xfsdump from Jakub. If anyone knows of something else we need, now is the > > > time to flame about it. I will take a look around for other important patches > > > too. > > > > > > This time I'm going to tag an -rc1 (probably later today or tomorrow). We'll > > > give everyone a few working days to do a final test and/or pipe up if we have > > > missed something important. Then if all goes well we'll cut the release next > > > Tuesday. > > > > I've tagged -rc1 for the upcoming releases of dmapi, xfsprogs, and xfsdump. If > > we missed something important now is the time to speak up. > > > > Currently there are two items of which I'm aware: > > > > 1) the Polish (and German) translations of xfsdump are not working. I'll start > > a separate thread for that issue. > > > > 2) Christoph has pointed out this patch series: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-05/msg00323.html > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00541.html > > I agree with christoph - the kernel side intptr/uintptr stuff that > Jan did needs to go into the kernel first, and then brought to > libxfs via a kernel code sync. A kernel code resync needs to be > done immediately after the xfsprogs release so that usrspace is > using the same base code for the CRC work, so splitting them to > before/after the relases makes sense IMO.... Sounds good. I'll pull in 2, 3, and 6 for now. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
