Thank you. Are there any comments on this patch or has is it been acked? On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looks good, but one thing I'd love here is to actually print a useful > error for the typical EIO case, as the "error 5 occured" message just > confuses the heck out of people. What it means is that we got an > EIO error from the block device, and that's what we should print. > > Probably worth doing in a separate patch, so: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs