On 10/21/12 21:15, wenqing.lz wrote: > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing. Thus we couldn't get the > result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285). > > CC: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2 <- v1: > * put return value check below the run_test() > > Hi Jeff, > > Could you please review this patch again? Thanks. > > Regards, > Zheng > > src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c > index 34f5508..3897f02 100644 > --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c > +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c > @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > goto out; > > for (i = 0; i < numtests; ++i) { > + ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]); > if (ret) > - goto out; > - run_test(&seek_tests[i]); > + break; > } > > out: Looks good to me, thank you! -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs