On 10/9/12 5:56 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:32:30PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 10/9/12 5:28 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:08:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On older systems we may not have preadv/pwritev and/or
>>>> sync_file_range.
>>>>
>>>> Add the configure magic, and stub out the code
>>>> where needed.
>>>>
>>>> (sync_file_range just needed a better test; preadv/pwritev
>>>> took a little more rearranging)
>>>>
>>>> And fix a couple typos ("numberic") while we're at it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Looks fine, though the "HAVE_PREADV" in the pwritev case is a bit
>>> wierd. Perhaps doing this:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/builddefs.in b/include/builddefs.in
>>>> index 81ebfcd..4a0e910 100644
>>>> --- a/include/builddefs.in
>>>> +++ b/include/builddefs.in
>>>> @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ HAVE_GETMNTENT = @have_getmntent@
>>>> HAVE_GETMNTINFO = @have_getmntinfo@
>>>> HAVE_FALLOCATE = @have_fallocate@
>>>> HAVE_FIEMAP = @have_fiemap@
>>>> +HAVE_PREADV = @have_preadv@
>>>
>>> HAVE_PWRITEV = @have_preadv@
>>>
>>> Would reduce that wierdness a bit when looking at the pwritev
>>> code....
>>
>> Yeah I was a little unhappy w/ that. But I think then we'd also need:
>>
>> +ifeq ($(HAVE_PWRITEV),yes)
>> +LCFLAGS += -DHAVE_PWRITEV
>> +endif
>
> True.
>
>> and at some point we might run out of room on the cmdline ;)
>
> Unlikely ;)
>
>> Could change it to HAVE_PREADWRITEV or something ...
>
> HAVE_VECTORED_IO?
Thought about that but we already have readv/writev, just not *P*readv/writev.
I can just add MOAR FLAGS if that looks better to you. ;)
(or HAVE_PVECTORED_IO?) ;)
-Eric
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
