On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:04:46PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Christoph suggested that xfs_flush_inodes should take an xfs_mount instead of > an inode. It is operating on the super_block level to flush multiple inodes > rather than the single inode whose pointer was passed in, so I moved it from > xfs_inode.h to xfs_mount.h. It's more than a trivial wrapper now, so I'd suggest to move out of line to e.g. xfs_super.c _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
