On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:22:05AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:10:22AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > index da69c18..0ec7a46 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ xfs_new_eof(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_fsize_t new_size)
> > static inline void
> > xfs_flush_inodes(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> > {
> > - writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb, WB_REASON_FS_FREE_SPACE);
> > + sync_inodes_sb(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb);
>
> sync_inodes_sb needs s_umount held and asserts that, while our callers
> usually won't have it.
Ah, bugger. I didn't notice that, and hadn't checked dmesg after I
ran 273 a few times with this patch. I just figured that because it
waited for completion, it didn't need it.
Adding s_umount is fine for the wirte path, but the create path
holds a directory i_mutex so I'd guess that means it has to be a
trylock to avoid lock inversion warnings from lockdep....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
