On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:33:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Test 068 is the go-to test for freeze deadlock coverage; > unfortunately it only uses fsstress, which doesn't do any mmap > IO. > > Using the existing fstest binary gets us a cheap mmap exerciser > as well. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > I think it's fair to modify this test vs. making a new one - > it's never passed yet, and will only start passing in kernel 3.6, > so it shouldn't cause new test regressions to add mmap ops. > > And I can verify that this finds mmap bugs; I had a backport > which messed up ext4's freeze vs. mmap handling, and this exposes > it. :) > > > diff --git a/068 b/068 > index 617420c..a0bf425 100755 > --- a/068 > +++ b/068 > @@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ touch $tmp.running > rmdir $STRESS_DIR > } & > > +# start fstest -m loop in a background block; this gets us mmap coverage > +{ > + FSTEST_DIR="$SCRATCH_MNT/fstest_test_dir" > + mkdir "$FSTEST_DIR" > + > + procs=2 > + while [ -f "$tmp.running" ] > + do > + src/fstest -m -p $FSTEST_DIR -n $procs -f 4 > /dev/null 2>&1 > + done > + > + rm -rf $FSTEST_DIR/* > + rmdir $FSTEST_DIR > +} & Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs