Hey Ted, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html > > On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially > setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests? You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;) > I'm not > subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to > avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox > (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on > the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes > to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are > other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing > list who would if there was a separate mailing list. > > Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I > guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well... I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But like you said, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes? Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
