On 09/11/2012 10:24 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/7/12 2:55 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 5/6/12 10:03 AM, Tao Ma wrote: >>> On 05/06/2012 07:37 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: >>>> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:07:09PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote: >>>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> In my test with ext4, 275 can't pass because ext4 >>>>> can create a 8k file in the end not like what xfs >>>>> does. So make this test case xfs only for now. >>>> >>>> It's not an XFS specific test - it's a test that is supposed to test >>>> POSIX write behaviour. i.e. if the filesystem is full, and then you >>>> free 4k of space, then an 8k write should only be able to write 4k, >>>> yes? >>> Yes, but it doesn't work as expected for ext4. >> >> Came across this thread again. I had patches on the list a while ago >> to fix it up. >> >> [PATCH V2] xfstests: make 275 pass >> >> But it never got fully reviewed or merged. :( > > It's reviewed & merged now. Does it fix things for you? (I hope?) No, but much better. It removes "lost+found" after mkfs, so the fsck will complain about it. So I have created the corresponding patch for it, and now the test case pass. Please see my patch "xfstests: 275, Don't remove all the files in SCRATCH_MNT". Thanks Tao _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
