On 09/12/2012 06:51 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/12/12 7:41 PM, Brad Figg wrote: > >> Eric, >> >> Thanks for taking the time to point this out. We will adjust our testing accordingly. >> We initially tried to run xfstest against ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs and btrfs. We are also >> trying to get these tests to run on several different kernel versions as you can >> see from our test results. We were running into issues on different kernels and various >> file-systems while getting our act together, we did this as a band-aid. > > I see. > >> I accept that we have some things to learn w.r.t. running this test suite. We will work >> to run the xfstests "as is" without any outside "intelligence". We do recognise that >> is a dynamic set of tests that people are adding to regularly. >> >> I am not attempting to get just a series of "pass" results. If that were my goal >> I could accomplish it much easier and would not have engaged with the community >> on the mailing list. We want to help where we can and will accept constructive >> criticism. > > Sorry, it sounds like I came across too strong there - it was just a little worrying to see failing or problematic tests disabled or otherwise artificially restricted. > > I'm actually very excited to see you setting up ongoing, public testing using xfstests, I think it'll be a great benefit, especially if there's a way to see a particular test's results across several kernel versions and/or filesystems and/or architectures, so that patterns of failure can emerge. > > If you find that xfstests is missing some feature or behavior which would facilitate testing in the automated environment, please do let us know what you need - or send patches. :) > > Thanks, > -Eric > >> Brad >> > No harm, no foul. We really don't mind constructive criticism. We are also eager to get this setup and running. We will try to contribute more than just running tests. I do want to point out that we are using the xfstests which is a snapshot in autotest. We do also look at the latest xfstests in the official xfstests repo and add it in when we see a delta. We will also work with the autotest maintainers to stay more up-to-date with xfstests. Thanks, Brad -- Brad Figg brad.figg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canonical.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs