On 08/30/12 07:00, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Instead of starting and stopping background work on the xfs_mount_wq all at the same time, separate them to where they really are needed to start and stop. The xfs_sync_worker, only needs to be started after all the mount processing has completed successfully, while it needs to be stopped before the log is unmounted. The xfs_reclaim_worker is started on demand, and can be stopped before the unmount process does it's own inode reclaim pass. The xfs_flush_inodes work is run on demand, and so we really only need to ensure that it has stopped running before we start processing an unmount, freeze or remount,ro. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
The patch itself looks good. and the "atomic_read(&bp->b_hold)> 0" assert appears specific to my machines, so forgive the noise.
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
