On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:56:38PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/25/12 3:13 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Ok, this is a significant rework of 275, which made too many > > assumptions about details of space usage and failed on several > > filesystems (it passed on xfs, but only by accident). > > > > This new version tries to leave about 256k free, then tries > > a single 1M IO, and fails only if 0 bytes are written. > > > > It also sends a lot more to $seq.full for debugging on failure > > and fixes a few other stylistic things. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Poor Zach ran into this one again. Can I get a review of this > version, and I'll merge it if it looks good? Looks OK. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
