On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:00:16PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > xfs_ilock() and friends really aren't related to the inode cache in > any way, so move them to xfs_inode.c with all the other inode > related functionality. > > While doing this move, move the xfs_ilock() tracepoints to *before* > the lock is taken so that when a hang on a lock occurs we have > events to indicate which process and what inode we were trying to > lock when the hang occurred. This is much better than the current > silence we get on a hang... Looks good. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
