On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:01:35AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote: > On 07/26/2012 03:39 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > >From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >USE_BIG_LOOPFS is really misnamed - it can be used on real devices just as > >easily as loop devices. It really means we are testing a large scratch device > >and that we should enable the special filesystem filling and checking options > >that enable xfstests to be run sanely on large XFS filesystems. > > > >Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > 004 | 2 +- > > 015 | 2 +- > > 030 | 2 +- > > 031 | 2 +- > > 032 | 2 +- > > 033 | 4 ++-- > > 041 | 2 +- > > 049 | 2 +- > > 083 | 2 +- > > 092 | 2 +- > > 148 | 2 +- > > 149 | 2 +- > > common | 2 +- > > common.rc | 12 ++++++------ > > setup | 5 +++-- > > 15 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > MOUNT_OPTIONS="$MOUNT_OPTIONS -o inode64" > > _scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs 2>/dev/null > >diff --git a/148 b/148 > >index 76cbf37..7bb1722 100755 > >--- a/148 > >+++ b/148 > >@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ _check_ag() > > _supported_fs xfs > > _supported_os IRIX Linux > > #RCJ As long as you are making changes to this file, please remove > Linux from the _supported_os as xfs_prepair64 is an IRIX specific > binary. Such a change belongs in a separate patch, not intermingled with a patch in a series that has nothing to do with xfs_prepair64.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
