Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/102]: xfs: 3.0.x stable kernel update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.08.2012 07:54, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Can please tell me if you did or didn't get the entire series. I
> didn't receive the entire series back in my inbox - about 20 are
> missing from my inbox.  A quick check of the archives shows that all
> 102 patches reached the server and entered the archive, so I'm
> curious to know how many people had delivery failures....

The thread (currently) occupies slots 78 to 180 in my MUA, which is 103 
of 103 if i'm counting right.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux