From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Upstream commit: ead360c50d33772f45943792893a58865adf3638
Because we no longer use the page cache for buffering, there is no
direct block number to page offset relationship anymore.
xfs_buf_get_pages is still setting up b_offset as if there was some
relationship, and that is leading to incorrectly setting up
*uncached* buffers that don't overwrite b_offset once they've had
pages allocated.
For cached buffers, the first block of the buffer is always at offset
zero into the allocated memory. This is true for sub-page sized
buffers, as well as for multiple-page buffers.
For uncached buffers, b_offset is only non-zero when we are
associating specific memory to the buffers, and that is set
correctly by the code setting up the buffer.
Hence remove the setting of b_offset in xfs_buf_get_pages, because
it is now always the wrong thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
index 5487eaa..3e9946c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
@@ -219,7 +219,6 @@ _xfs_buf_get_pages(
{
/* Make sure that we have a page list */
if (bp->b_pages == NULL) {
- bp->b_offset = xfs_buf_poff(bp->b_file_offset);
bp->b_page_count = page_count;
if (page_count <= XB_PAGES) {
bp->b_pages = bp->b_page_array;
--
1.7.10
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
