On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:39:38PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > Actually, there is no reason about why a user must umount and mount a XFS > filesystem to enable 'inode64' option. So, this patch makes this a remountable > option. What does protect concurrent updates of m_flags? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs