Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:35:40AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote: >> I've attached my benchmark program but I use alot of boost c++ with a >> little internal set of libraries... so you can see what I"m doing but it >> likely won't compile for you. I'll also mention that boost is a very low >> overhead (if any) over all the normal system calls one would use (verified >> by reading sourcecode in use). > > I'd suggest rewriting it so we can compile and run it. If I can > reproduce the problem, I can at least understand where the latency > is coming from. The boost::chrono usage is the weirdest one that'll likely cause issues. Should be replaced with boost::posix_time instead (it's been around a lot longer)... otherwise it's just having to install all the boost headers I think (boost is basically 99.9% implemented in header files and templates) -- Stewart Smith
Attachment:
pgpst5lLW8KZC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
