On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:24:36PM +0800, Jie Liu wrote: > >Output: > > > >HOLE/DATA at 512K 786432 / 528384 <- undiscovered hole here > >HOLE/DATA at 516K 786432 / 528384 <- okay, data but we should > > return next page as hole. > >HOLE/DATA at 520K 532480 / 819200 <- hole is discovered because > > there is no trailing data > Oops! for xfs_seek_hole(), I should use min_t() to pre-claculate > offset before searching page cache. > Thanks for your prompt feedback. I'll do some extra tests and post > the revised soon. Yes, the above test cases should go into xfstests. Thanks to both of you to spend all the effort on this feature. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
