Re: [PATCH 0/5] do not take the iolock in inode reclaim context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ping/  I'd really like to get this queued up for 3.6

I forget if I mentioned this before, but I pulled this series into our 
testing branch and have had no problems (aside from the last patch not 
applying to my tree) in qa (ceph on xfs) over the last couple of weeks.

sage


> 
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:13:28AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This series should fix the (false-positive) lockdep warnings Sage
> > has seen while testing ceph workloads with heavy attr usage.
> > 
> > Btw, you probably should create the XFS filesystems for Ceph usage
> > with large inodes to avoid going out of line for the attributes.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux