Hey, Linus. On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:00:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > nr_running is atomic_t (*nr_running)[2]. Ignoring the pointer to > > array part, it's just returning the address of N'th element of the > > array. ARRAY + N == &ARRAY[N]. > > None of this matters one whit. > > You did "&(x)[0]". > > That's insane. It's crazy. It doesn't even matter what "x" is in > between, it's crazy regardless. Eh, from my previous reply. | Ah okay, you're looking at the fifth patch in isolation. Upto this | point, the index is always 0. I'm puttin it in as a placeholder for | the next patch which makes use of non-zero index. This patch is | supposed to prepare everything for multiple pools and thus non-zero | index. The patch is about converting stuff to handle size-1 array without introducing any actual behavior change so that the next patch can bump the array size and just change the index. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
