On 07/03/2012 11:06 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 07/03/12 02:30, Jeff Liu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to enlarge the test coverage of 286 to includes file mapping >> with repeated hole/unwritten/unwritten_without_data/data intersections. >> >> Those two new sub-tests could help verifying the current >> seek_data/seek_hole improvements. >> >> Besides, I observed a weird thing at the diff of 286.full, look at the >> the sparse file creation output, there seems to be a significant >> I/O degradation compare to the old test01/test02 IOPS results: >> >> -1 MiB, 256 ops; 0.0000 sec (1.242 GiB/sec and 325699.7455 ops/sec) >> +1 MiB, 256 ops; 0.0000 sec (70.161 MiB/sec and 17961.1310 ops/sec) >> >> I run the test on same machine and same partition, I recalled the old >> result is generated against around 3.4-rc2(not very sure), now is updated >> to 3.5-rc4, does anyone hit that? >> >> > > Quick feedback. I don't see any degradation. Thanks for the verification. > > OLD: 1 MiB, 256 ops; 0.0000 sec (484.027 MiB/sec and 123910.9390 ops/sec) > THIS: 1 MiB, 256 ops; 0.0000 sec (494.560 MiB/sec and 126607.3195 ops/sec) > > All the tests are very close to the unpatched results. > >> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> 286 | 87 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 286.full | 82 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > Please, drop the 286.full patch. Ok, will re-post a little while. Thanks, -Jeff > > --Mark Tinguely. > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
