On Sun, Jul 01 2012 at 10:53am -0400, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Il 21/06/2012 19:47, Mike Snitzer ha scritto: > > Paolo Bonzini fixed blkdev_issue_discard to properly align some time > > ago; unfortunately the patches slipped through the cracks (cc'ing Paolo, > > Jens, and Christoph). > > > > Here are references to Paolo's patches: > > 0/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/323 > > 1/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/324 > > 2/2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/14/325 > > > > Patch 2/2 specifically addresses the case where: > > discard_max_bytes == discard_granularity > > > > Paolo, any chance you could resend to Jens (maybe with hch's comments on > > patch#2 accounted for)? Also, please add hch's Reviewed-by when > > reposting. > > Sure, I'll do it this week. I just need to retest. Great, thanks. (cc'ing mkp) One thing that seemed odd was your adjustment for discard_alignment (in patch 1/2). I need to better understand how discard_alignment (an offset despite the name not saying as much) relates to alignment_offset. Could just be that once a partition tool, or lvm, etc account for alignment_offset (which they do now) that discard_alignment is automagically accounted for as a side-effect? (I haven't actually seen discard_alignment != 0 in the wild) Mike _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
