On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:48:24AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +STATIC int
> > +_xfs_buf_get_maps(
>
> Should this really be STATIC which prevents inlining even if the
> compiler thinks that's a good idea? (Same for the free side)
Not really, just habit. I'll change it.
> Also any reason for the underscore in the naming?
Just that other internal functions used it. I'll remove it.
> > + bp->b_bn = map[0].bm_bn;
> > + bp->b_length = 0;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nmaps; i++) {
> > + bp->b_maps[i].bm_bn = map[i].bm_bn;
> > + bp->b_maps[i].bm_len = map[i].bm_len;
> > + bp->b_length += map[i].bm_len;
> > + }
> > + bp->b_io_length = bp->b_length;
> > +
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < nmaps; i++) {
> > + numblks += map[i].bm_len;
> > + }
>
> no need for the curly braces here.
ok.
>
> > + struct xfs_buf *bp,
> > + int map,
> > + int *buf_offset,
> > + int *count,
> > + int rw)
> > {
> > - int rw, map_i, total_nr_pages, nr_pages;
> > + int page_index;
>
> The indentation for the arguments and local variables doesn't seem to
> line up here.
Oops, my bad. Will fix.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
