On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:19:33AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > One of the things which would be nice to be able to easily set up is a > configuration where we get the benefits of thin provisioning with > respect to snapshost, but where the underlying block device used by > the file system is contiguous. We're tracking this requirement (for lvm2) here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814737 Alasdair _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
