Hi Fengguang,
On 06/14/2012 10:49 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:20:26AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:39:32PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Hi Christoph, Dave,
>>>
>>> I got this lockdep warning on XFS when running the xfs tests:
>>>
>>> [ 704.832019] =================================
>>> [ 704.832019] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
>>> [ 704.832019] 3.5.0-rc1+ #8 Tainted: G W
>>> [ 704.832019] ---------------------------------
>>> [ 704.832019] inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
>>> [ 704.832019] fsstress/11619 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
>>> [ 704.832019] (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++?.}, at: [<ffffffff8143953d>] xfs_ilock_nowait+0xd7/0x1d0
>>> [ 704.832019] {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at:
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e30a2>] mark_irqflags+0x12d/0x13e
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e32f6>] __lock_acquire+0x243/0x3f9
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e3a1c>] lock_acquire+0x112/0x13d
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810b8931>] down_write_nested+0x54/0x8b
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81438fab>] xfs_ilock+0xd8/0x17d
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff814431b8>] xfs_reclaim_inode+0x4a/0x2cb
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff814435ee>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x1b5/0x28e
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff814437d7>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x33/0x3a
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8144050e>] xfs_fs_free_cached_objects+0x15/0x17
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81196076>] prune_super+0x103/0x154
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81152fa7>] shrink_slab+0x1ec/0x316
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8115574f>] balance_pgdat+0x308/0x618
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81155c22>] kswapd+0x1c3/0x1dc
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810b3f77>] kthread+0xaf/0xb7
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff82f480b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>>
>> ......
>>> [ 704.832019] stack backtrace:
>>> [ 704.832019] Pid: 11619, comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 3.5.0-rc1+ #8
>>> [ 704.832019] Call Trace:
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff82e92243>] print_usage_bug+0x1f5/0x206
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e2220>] ? check_usage_forwards+0xa6/0xa6
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff82e922c3>] mark_lock_irq+0x6f/0x120
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e2f02>] mark_lock+0xaf/0x122
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e3d4e>] mark_held_locks+0x6d/0x95
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810c5cd1>] ? local_clock+0x36/0x4d
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e3de3>] __lockdep_trace_alloc+0x6d/0x6f
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e42e7>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x3d/0x57
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff811837c8>] kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x47/0x1b4
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff810e377d>] ? lock_release_nested+0x9f/0xa6
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81431650>] ? _xfs_buf_find+0xaa/0x302
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff811710a2>] ? new_vmap_block.constprop.18+0x3a/0x1de
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff811710a2>] new_vmap_block.constprop.18+0x3a/0x1de
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8117144a>] vb_alloc.constprop.16+0x204/0x225
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8117149d>] vm_map_ram+0x32/0xaa
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81430c95>] _xfs_buf_map_pages+0xb3/0xf5
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81431a6a>] xfs_buf_get+0xd3/0x1ac
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81492dd9>] xfs_trans_get_buf+0x180/0x244
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8146947a>] xfs_da_do_buf+0x2a0/0x5cc
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff81469826>] xfs_da_get_buf+0x21/0x23
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8146f894>] xfs_dir2_data_init+0x44/0xf9
>>> [ 704.832019] [<ffffffff8146e94f>] xfs_dir2_sf_to_block+0x1ef/0x5d8
>>
>> Bug in vm_map_ram - it does an unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocation
>> here, and we are in a GFP_NOFS context. We can't pass a gfp_mask to
>> vm_map_ram(), so until vm_map_ram() grows that we can't fix it...
>
> This trivial patch should fix it.
>
> The only behavior change is the XFS part:
>
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
>
> do {
> bp->b_addr = vm_map_ram(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count,
> - -1, PAGE_KERNEL);
> + -1, GFP_NOFS, PAGE_KERNEL);
> if (bp->b_addr)
> break;
> vm_unmap_aliases();
>
> Does that look fine to you?
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> ---
>
> From 7301975d3211da2ce07723c294cf3260229fe84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:38:33 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: add @gfp_mask parameter to vm_map_ram()
>
> XFS needs GFP_NOFS allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/firewire/ohci.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/video/videobuf2-dma-sg.c | 1 +
> drivers/media/video/videobuf2-vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 2 +-
> mm/nommu.c | 3 ++-
> mm/vmalloc.c | 7 ++++---
> 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
> index c1af05e..b53f5a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static int ar_context_init(struct ar_context *ctx, struct fw_ohci *ohci,
> for (i = 0; i < AR_WRAPAROUND_PAGES; i++)
> pages[AR_BUFFERS + i] = ctx->pages[i];
> ctx->buffer = vm_map_ram(pages, AR_BUFFERS + AR_WRAPAROUND_PAGES,
> - -1, PAGE_KERNEL);
> + -1, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL);
> if (!ctx->buffer)
> goto out_of_memory;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-dma-sg.c b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-dma-sg.c
> index 25c3b36..d087f52 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-dma-sg.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-dma-sg.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ static void *vb2_dma_sg_vaddr(void *buf_priv)
> buf->vaddr = vm_map_ram(buf->pages,
> buf->sg_desc.num_pages,
> -1,
> + GFP_KERNEL,
> PAGE_KERNEL);
>
> /* add offset in case userptr is not page-aligned */
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-vmalloc.c b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-vmalloc.c
> index 6b5ca6c..548ebda 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-vmalloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/videobuf2-vmalloc.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void *vb2_vmalloc_get_userptr(void *alloc_ctx, unsigned long vaddr,
> goto fail_get_user_pages;
>
> buf->vaddr = vm_map_ram(buf->pages, buf->n_pages, -1,
> - PAGE_KERNEL);
> + GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL);
> if (!buf->vaddr)
> goto fail_get_user_pages;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index 172d3cc..b3e7289 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ _xfs_buf_map_pages(
>
> do {
> bp->b_addr = vm_map_ram(bp->b_pages, bp->b_page_count,
> - -1, PAGE_KERNEL);
> + -1, GFP_NOFS, PAGE_KERNEL);
> if (bp->b_addr)
> break;
> vm_unmap_aliases();
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> index dcdfc2b..c811763 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct vm_struct {
> */
> extern void vm_unmap_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int count);
> extern void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> - int node, pgprot_t prot);
> + int node, gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot);
> extern void vm_unmap_aliases(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> index d4b0c10..2fb4ec1 100644
> --- a/mm/nommu.c
> +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> @@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ void vunmap(const void *addr)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vunmap);
>
> -void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count, int node, pgprot_t prot)
> +void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> + int node, gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> BUG();
> return NULL;
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 2aad499..3f736d1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1088,21 +1088,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_ram);
> *
> * Returns: a pointer to the address that has been mapped, or %NULL on failure
> */
> -void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count, int node, pgprot_t prot)
> +void *vm_map_ram(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> + int node, gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> unsigned long size = count << PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long addr;
> void *mem;
>
> if (likely(count <= VMAP_MAX_ALLOC)) {
> - mem = vb_alloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mem = vb_alloc(size, gfp_mask);
> if (IS_ERR(mem))
> return NULL;
> addr = (unsigned long)mem;
> } else {
> struct vmap_area *va;
> va = alloc_vmap_area(size, PAGE_SIZE,
> - VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END, node, GFP_KERNEL);
> + VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END, node, gfp_mask);
> if (IS_ERR(va))
> return NULL;
>
It shouldn't work because vmap_page_range still can allocate GFP_KERNEL by pud_alloc in vmap_pud_range.
For it, I tried [1] but other mm guys want to add WARNING [2] so let's avoiding gfp context passing.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/23/77
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/2/340
Thanks.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
