Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE to fallocate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:35:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:36:02PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > This patch adds the FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE operation mode to fallocate,
> > resembling the similar XFS ioctl.  The new mode can be used with
> > or without FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, but of course not together with
> > FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE.
> 
> !FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE makes no sense for this operation. It is for
> zeroing an existing section of a file while retaining the allocated
> space, not for extending or truncating the file. It's the same
> reason that FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE must have FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE set.
> 
> Also, a minor nit, but you should credit where this code has
> originated from in the commit messages, and describe the use case
> for requiring it. i.e. based on:
> 
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/62449

Oh, and you'll need to provide a new xfstests test based on 242 that
uses the new fallocate interface, and to do that you'll also need to
add support for the new fallocate function in xfs_io.

Adding generic filesystem functionality is not as simple as writing a
kernel patch anymore... :/

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux