On 06/05/2012 07:54 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:03:04PM -0400, Peter Watkins wrote: >> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Juerg Haefliger <juergh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: snip > At this point, running on a 3.5-rc1 kernel is what we need to get > working reliably. Once we have the problems solved there, we can > work out what set of patches need to be backported to 3.0-stable and > other kernels to fix the problems in those supported kernels... > Hi guys, I've been reproducing a similar stall in my testing of the 're-enable xfsaild idle mode' patch/thread that only occurs for me in the xfs tree. I was able to do a bisect from rc2 down to commit 43ff2122, though the history of this issue makes me wonder if this commit just makes the problem more reproducible as opposed to introducing it. Anyways, the characteristics I observe so far: - Task blocked for more than 120s message in xlog_grant_head_wait(). I see xfs_sync_worker() in my current bt, but I'm pretty sure I've seen the same issue without it involved. - The AIL is not empty/idle. It spins with a relatively small and constant number of entries (I've seen ~8-40). These items are all always marked as "flushing." - Via crash, all the inodes in the ail appear to be marked as stale (i.e. li_cb == xfs_istale_done). The inode flags are XFS_ISTALE|XFS_IRECLAIMABLE|XFS_IFLOCK. - The iflock in particular is why the ail marks these items 'flushing' and why nothing seems to proceed any further (xfsaild just waits for these to complete). I can kick the fs back into action with a 'sync.' It looks like we only mark in inode stale when an inode cluster is freed, so I repeated this test with 'ikeep' and cannot reproduce. I'm not sure if anybody is testing for this in recent kernels (Mark?), but if so I'd be curious if ikeep has any effect on your test (BTW, this is still the looping 273 xfstest). It seems like there could be some kind of race here with inodes being marked stale, but also appears that either completion (xfs_istale_done() or xfs_iflush_done()) should release the flush lock. I'll see if I can trace it further and get anything useful... Brian > Cheers, > > Dave. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
