On Thursday 2012-05-24 18:25, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> (I frown upon using libtool directly and seek to replace it with an >> assisted version using automake. There is however __quite__ some >> cruft in the src tree.) > >Agreed that the build system could use love, do we have a volunteer? :) Certainly. Perhaps confirm that the following oddballs indeed mark code that can be replaced: - __psint_t/__psunsigned_t looks very much like a pre-C-standard attempt at intptr_t/uintptr_t [and should be changed accordingly] - many files in include/ should actually be in include/xfs/ (which does not exist at clone time) - 'struct stat64' smells really like an implementation detail of how -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (or the absence thereof) is handled. If the -D is given, isn't "struct stat" enough for all supported OSes? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
